Tuesday, October 18, 2011

The Particular and The Particular

Just can't seem to escape the question of the relationship between the particular and the universal. Or as this snippet of Marx seems to suggest, the relationship between the particular and the particular.

It comes from the Theories of Surplus Value in the discussion of Adam Smith, the subsection The Distinction between Productive and Unproductive Labour, and within that subsection, the subsection 17 on Nassau Senior. Unfortunately this link lands you far from the passage in question.



Man himself is the basis of his material production, as of every other production that he carries on. All circumstances, therefore, which affect man, the subject of production, modify plus ou moins all his functions and activities, and therefore his functions and activities as the creator of material wealth, of commodities too. In this respect it can in fact be demonstrated that all human relations and functions, however and in whatever they may present themselves, influence material production and engage with it determinatively to a greater or lesser degree.

For such a short passage, I have revised the translation at MIA pretty seriously. Specially in the last clause. What I have translated as "engage" appears there as "have decisive influence on." The German eingreifen generally means "intervention," like a military intervention or what authorities do in general. A very literal translation would be "in-grip," stick your hand in and grab hold. So it denotes and connotes a very active and forceful imposition from the outside.

Marx says, the relationships of production, in other words class positions, are actively and forcefully shaped by all the circumstances, like race and gender, that affect humans.

Pace universalism/class reductionism.

6 comments:

  1. Great tips these look so natural in reading if someone implements it in their life their result is confirmed.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The particular is shaped by its surroundings, influenced by broader trends and systems, and can only be fully understood within this context. For example, an individual's personality traits are influenced by their upbringing, culture, and social environment

    ReplyDelete
  3. This concept challenges the notion that all objects or events can be solely categorized under general or universal attributes, suggesting that the particularity of things cannot be overlooked or reduced to more abstraction.

    ReplyDelete
  4. To embrace the individuality and distinctiveness of every person's perspective, celebrating the diversity that exists within our collective human experience.

    ReplyDelete
  5. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  6. It seems like a thought-provoking topic and explain expectations about own work role as expressed in relevant standards. Could you provide more context or insight to stimulate discussion?

    ReplyDelete