tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18174466.post4743762150914936171..comments2024-03-29T03:05:29.525-07:00Comments on Qlipoth: Commodity Fanaticism - IQlipothhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17343878659776948134noreply@blogger.comBlogger149125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18174466.post-40105061508712892802010-04-11T16:05:16.339-07:002010-04-11T16:05:16.339-07:00.............................. .................................................... .............................<br />.............................. .............................# ,,<br />.............................. .................##......,##,<br />.............................. .................##,#...,###,<br />.....................######... ..........##,#,,.,###,<br />.................##,,,#####,,, .....,##,,#,,,#,##,,<br />............##########......,, ##,,,####,##,<br />.....,,.......#.,......,####.. ..###,,##,,,,,###,<br />...............,.....,###,,,,# ##,,,##,,,,,####,<br />...............,,####,.,##,,,, ,##,,######,<br />..........,,#####,...#,,.,#### ..,######<br />.......,###,,,##...#,,.,#####. ,#####,<br />.....,###,,.,##,.,##,#####,,., ####,<br />.....####..,##########,,..#### ,<br />...,,####,.,##########,,,###,,<br />.....#####,.,,####,,,#,####,,<br />......,#####,,,,####,,,###,##,<br />..........,,###########,##,.,# ##,<br />.................#########...# #.,,###<br />.................####...,####. ..#.....##,<br />...............,,#####..,####, .,,.....##,<br />.................,,##........# ##..........##.<br />...............,,##........... ,##<br />.............,##,............. .##,<br />...,,##,,###...........,,#,.,# #,<br />...,##,,,,.....,,#.....,##,,,, ..,,,,,,#,<br />.............................. ...................Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18174466.post-42025331463290126582010-03-02T12:25:31.736-08:002010-03-02T12:25:31.736-08:00even HG Wells has to be described as furiously ang...even HG Wells has to be described as furiously angry about the extermination of the Tasmanians and his War of the Worlds as a revenge fantasy for that genocide, when clearly it is much more ambivalent. Wells' white supremacism is simply skipped over and the complexity of thoughts and feelings about this as they emerge from the novel, erased. A simpleminded and oversimplifying exegetical practise, applied to Wells in passing and to Brecht at length (so as to avoid the whole Marxist tradition of interpretation), is mirrored in the practise of architecture appreciation and the result is the construction of an essential Britishness that is an object of nationalistic notaligia, with its core an essential Englishness from which it is only very slightly distinguishable (the difference are some not ethnically English major architects of Britain's modernist buildings), and a heroic history of British Labour Socialism purified of its imperialism historically which then relies on, and supports, the re-valorisation of its aesthetic practise and self-image, in this modernism, and protects that practise and its products from the critique which would expose its relation to and convenience for an imperialist Britishness based in Englishness that is to be justified with these cultural self-expressions. So Hatherley chooses to see neither the imperialism of the period in question, nor the ideology of imperialism in its architecture, just as he chooses not to see the tradition he echoes in his account of Bourriaud's dubious funding conspiracy, though it belongs within the earlier part of the period concerning him. But he knows the history, the architecture and the period too well, or seems to, for us to assume these failures to notice are anything but deliberate.Qlipothhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17343878659776948134noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18174466.post-12711734432980421712010-03-02T10:18:30.185-08:002010-03-02T10:18:30.185-08:00listen -
http://www.friezefoundation.org/talks/de...listen -<br /><br />http://www.friezefoundation.org/talks/detail/nostalgia_whats_the_role_of_the_past_in_fashioning_the_future<br /><br />Militant Modernism is a book concened with defining Britishness (as englishness, brutal and benevolent - avoidance of imperialism as topic, whitewash, apologia.Qlipothhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17343878659776948134noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18174466.post-6403530702329155082010-03-02T10:07:57.534-08:002010-03-02T10:07:57.534-08:00joke!joke!Qlipothhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17343878659776948134noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18174466.post-16951321810755435392010-03-02T10:05:06.139-08:002010-03-02T10:05:06.139-08:00'submissive Chinese media workers who should t...'submissive Chinese media workers who should toil away in squalor until they learn a proper respect for the value of civilisation and the idea of communism'.<br /><br />Wow. Where is this from - the NLR article? I can't afford the subscription so haven't been able to look at it. <br /><br />You're right to call Hatherley on this. The (mostly) defensive commentary here is disappointing. It compounds the sense that there's a general indifference towards taking the implications of such lacunae seriously. <br /><br />I remember a couple of years ago stumbling across an extended riff on 'paki' bashing in the 'Sit Down' comments box and feeling quite nauseated. It was done with this jokey jokeyness that is meant to interpolate would be critics as uptight pedants. <br /><br />This faux sub-proletarian subaltern swagger just serves as a foil to deflect attention from collusion in this unsavoury discourse. Whatever he's trying to say about the social function of art, its badly compromised by this sort of inflection however much he argues he is giving expression to a class based form of resentment. <br /><br />That's no reason for giving an inch to divide and rule rhetoric, in this case pitting one dispossessed community against another, which the UK ruling class over the past decade or so has diffused with the assistance of an ever genuflecting media.richardnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18174466.post-44042363705846834482010-03-02T05:45:28.893-08:002010-03-02T05:45:28.893-08:00"ARPEGE! Where did Owen use 'replete'..."ARPEGE! Where did Owen use 'replete' wrongly?' "<br /><br />Oh was it this?<br /><br />http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guggenheim_Abu_Dhabi<br /><br />"...we must draw the reader's eye to the building replete with a sign that says The Guggenheim...named for Solomon A. Guggenheim, a Jewish capitalist. Aside from being a major buyer of modern art and the owner of museums in NY, Venice and Bilbao, the Guggenheim's portfolio includes shares in "evil Orient enterprises" and devotes itself to constructing handsome buildings and pleasureable spaces not only where the population deserves them, as in North America and Europe, but where they do not belong, where Arabs live, when everyone knows the proper tabula rasa the West arranges for its Arab wards is a landscape of radioactive rubble, and that only those who make museums in the Arab world which look like this<br /><br /><br />http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_oEn2IoOE3Pc/R-O-uhDppYI/AAAAAAAAAW0/r7BvOgfQY5U/s400/bagdad_museum_1%5B1%5D.jpg<br /><br />deserve modernism, modernity, post-modernity and beauty in their cities and lives.<br /><br />or<br /><br />http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China_Central_Television_Headquarters_building<br /><br />"An expensive new structure, replete with running water, electricity, and superfluous design elements, is to be wasted on robotic, submissive Chinese media workers who should toil away in squalor until they learn a proper respect for the value of civilisation and the idea of communism."Qlipothhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17343878659776948134noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18174466.post-63038645327058589172010-03-02T03:32:00.295-08:002010-03-02T03:32:00.295-08:00"The panel does a good job of sort of chuckli..."The panel does a good job of sort of chuckling him down a bit, but he seems quite pissed about it. <br /><br />Then again, he's lit out of his mind,"<br /><br />yes but there is method to his madness - he is recycling tried and true patterns of propaganda, in his Borattian performance. And it seems to work with way too many of these impressionable students susceptible to his flattery and the way constructs the illusion of an exclusive member's only club, like Nietzsche's imaginary gang of monsters of courage, around himself.Qlipothhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17343878659776948134noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18174466.post-75883895034494739392010-03-02T03:02:01.414-08:002010-03-02T03:02:01.414-08:00wait wait, that link is to this thread here.wait wait, that link is to this thread here.Qlipothhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17343878659776948134noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18174466.post-90977074800344352012010-03-01T23:34:59.651-08:002010-03-01T23:34:59.651-08:00By now he's seen what I've written here, a...By now he's seen what I've written here, and this is his latest comment; <br /><br /> La Fayetc zei...<br />Oh, and how did I forget to mention it? Chabert deleted all Hatherley's comments on the thread! Worse than pathetic much?<br /><br />Okay, you probably can see how he operates, and you can say you don't care how he operates, but this is how he operates. It's pretty lame if you ask me. So no mood-pulls, please. I obviously have nothing to offer on the new Marx post, so this is just tying up some loose ends that have gone on too long. In his previous post at that Dejan's, where I can't write again because Old Nick owns it now, which is good for me, he says Owen doesn't say much about his 'politics', he describes it much the way I described earlier this evening Old Nick's own 'politics', trying to 'figure out who he should be for or not', something like that. Owen can at least be said to have done a much better job of even weak politics than someone who thought Dick Cheney was quite the ultimate thrill (living in Shanghai, he has purposely cultivated amnesia.) <br /><br />This is all a pain in the ass to have to post, but that's what happens when you talk about 'text-messaging harassment' in a way that is not terribly impressive, unless you really did get an 'obscene text message' on Feb 22. I don't even know how text-messages work, so how could he send you one without knowing your address, or is that just the old blog one? I don't care if you know him, the 'nazi trap' he claimed to be laying for me when I was in Hollywood at Xmas wouldn't work even if you were, because all such a 'Nazi trap' would mean is easier non-access to these blogs: This can be a blessing, and you start getting more phone calls from people you want to hear from that way. So that his idea of a 'Nazi trap of me' would mean a full release from prison. Although I can't say I haven't enjoyed writing on this thread. We have had our good moments, you know, it doesn't matter a fuck what Dejan says. Traxus told me recently when here that you, Nick and I were the best writers in this blogosphere, an interesting remark. Of course, having been 'nazi-trapped', I am unquestionably the best. but we look at some shoes and dress shops for you...I think on Bleecker.Complaisant Personnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18174466.post-57711735418970868452010-03-01T21:51:28.697-08:002010-03-01T21:51:28.697-08:00Look, i know you and I don't trust each other ...Look, i know you and I don't trust each other either--nor should we pretend we even particularly want to. i think I have probably put this here because it's part of making the best of bad deal sort of thing. I don't believe you didn't know who he was, for one thing, so that's why I've put this here. Now you have no choice but to know (which you indicated you wanted to know.) Okay, that sounds rude, but we know how the internet works (not so well, and these 'martin' and 'ajb' people have been variously also identified as philosophers Veal and Mackay, these are all close Warwick Univ. associates. So there were probably a bunch of CCRU people working together on this, so I guess I get to see myself as a CIA-type sex spy. I really don't care what anybody else thinks, now that I got through this alive.)<br /><br />My main interest in this is what the enjoyment is for the malicious troll of the serious sort, that tries to interfere with offline life. It must surely be exactly like the hacker who doesn't really care to spend the money on the acounts he fucks, but rather just enjoys it as an end in itself. I have never had any insight into this mentality, so I never catch onto it.Complaisant Personnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18174466.post-78447358463724425292010-03-01T21:37:53.266-08:002010-03-01T21:37:53.266-08:00Philosophically, his main interest is the superior...Philosophically, his main interest is the superiority of the lie to the truth. He could have easily stopped all the mess at Dejan's last summer, and I asked him in emails to do so by coming there, even if it was just to proclaim that it was someone else doing it, but he didn't, clearly because he wanted to see how far he could take the game--not unlike he took his pet projects of 'WWIV', which were about the expansion of the Iraq War, and his maniacal support of Karl Rove (he used to talk about 'Karl Rove wet dreams', and that 'the man is a saint', only half-jokingly). But back then, no matter what he wrote about, there was a sharpness to it. If you look at this shit he's written at Dejan, it's just blunt-edged and weak. I don't know if you can see the opportunism in it, but it's there, mainly in the 'some of this is very interesting if you're into that stuff', and the bullshit of 'being into that stuff because supported by the taxpayer', like sitting in the 4th ring of NYState Theater was different from paying twice as much to travel to rock concerts or even pay monthly cable bills (I don't have cable, for example, nor need it, and sometimes go to dance programs at the Joyce for $10--it's an attitude against culture that is not obviously populist, no matter how much or little it costs, isn't it? If you don't say so or not, I shall simply be forced to assume that a $10 monthly payment to the Joyce, where I saw PNB, Ballet Hispanic and a Taiwanese Company, as quite 'non-elitist' at least in terms of 'money egotism', compared to monthly cable service--which I have nothing against. I just don't need to watch TV.<br /><br />This is not to make 'nice=nice', which is the current Dejanian propaganda, as in form of 'sucking missus's tits', etc., he bores the fuck out of me by now.Complaisant Personnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18174466.post-7336145024654348292010-03-01T21:35:55.656-08:002010-03-01T21:35:55.656-08:00https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=176631066...https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1766310661586319511&postID=3671874961641479818<br /><br />It's pointless not to read this, I put the link because you say you never go in there and read, or want to give that impression, it doesn't matter. This is just for the record. The man passing judgment on you and me for 'our finery' and 'snobbisms' found it inconvenient to continue as an 'official neocon' once McCain ('brave when it counts', this hyperstitionist said), was defeated. He just wants a forum, and got it at Dejan's because nobody went to Hyperstition anymore. It wasn't possible for me to write even a single word there after I knew he was operating in this solidly malicious way. So that his 'prole-identified' tastes are the very ones from 'Martin' (if you don't want to believe it's the same as 'ajb', at least HE says they're the same, said he 'cornholed you' at leninino's that day, and 'won the battle' in the old traxus thread, unfortunately relinked, or maybe fortunately, so that all this business can be dispensed with). It's true he always thought 'free market forces' should be at work in determining culture, so you need 'market discipline', he 'prescribed' a 'labor reeducation camp' for me, which produced primarily a lot of pleasuring of me, so I have a hard time understanding that. <br /><br />I really can't believe you don't know all this, but you are saying you don't. As for 'real text messages', I don't know of any, I knew it impossible he was text-messaging you, and he said only to say that he was 'on speaking terms' with everyone and that I was more or less surrounded. This proved not to be true, of course. <br /><br />Also, I don't know why he even talks about 'series' vs. 'serial', but then I haven't read all your TV things, it's too long-winded for me to stay interested, especially since I've never seen The Wire. But 'serials' were already not 'stand-alone', as he calls them, as far back as the night-time soaps like 'Dallas' and 'Dynasty', and soon evolved into 'Hill Street Blues' in the early 80s, with continuing stories. I think those were the first, though, around that time. The old series format for hour-long shows wore out, I don't know if any at all exist anymore.<br /><br />Of course, this 'lafayetc' claims not to be who he really is, but then he signs in as 'lafayesitsmenickland' and, of course, never does make clear what his real identity is. That's why, even if he is right that you and/or I are SCUM, it means little coming from a total capitalist of situations. It was always interesting to me that he hated 'elitist culture' but totally supported the Iraq War and 'money elitism' as clearly embodied by Bush and Cheney.Complaisant Personnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18174466.post-68355551640573864252010-03-01T19:01:27.105-08:002010-03-01T19:01:27.105-08:00http://www.townhouseny.com/
Utterly hilarious cop...http://www.townhouseny.com/<br /><br />Utterly hilarious copy, about a 'place where men of means can feel comfortable', and 'proper dress a must'. All of it amusing. But oh dear, piano bars with sing-alongs....that gets a bit bangy, and since so 'upscale', may mean at least less of 'Climb Ev'ry Mountain', and more of 'Losing My Mind' and 'Nothing's Gonna Harm You'. I HATE 'Sweeney Todd', it's truly repulsive--I almost feel like he had a right to make all those human pies and sell them for big $$$$$$$$$ because he didn't get tenure....Sometimes Sondheim just pretentious, as with the meat-pie patrons singing 'God, that's Good'. Loathsome. <br /><br />Anyway, saw no menu, so it looks like that's out for us. Most my friends are str8 anyway, so the Pierre will be just fine for lewd assignations...and the food very good there, but trop cher.Complaisant Personnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18174466.post-60096168150934855022010-03-01T18:15:17.599-08:002010-03-01T18:15:17.599-08:00I see his cocaine problem is still progressing nic...I see his cocaine problem is still progressing nicely.<br /><br />Everything he tries to assert on that video would just get obliterated by any second or third rate history or poli sci professor in the U.S. (not even the howling-at-the-moon mulitculturalists from the Africana or Women's Studies departments that he fear so much. Just plain old history buffs). The panel does a good job of sort of chuckling him down a bit, but he seems quite pissed about it. <br /><br />Then again, he's lit out of his mind, so it's stupid to try to read his mannerism...anodynelitehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09196712046993163381noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18174466.post-80315826238912027292010-03-01T17:12:55.793-08:002010-03-01T17:12:55.793-08:00Borat borat, because he appears now on TV only in ...Borat borat, because he appears now on TV only in his gulag issue underwear, sweating.<br /><br />look at how nervous he is made by the footage of the overt fascists.<br /><br />http://www.youtube.com/user/AlJazeeraEnglish#p/search/0/aZwesgneidE<br /><br />"those disgusting creatures" he says, feeling Tariq Ramadan's sardonic and tolerant smirk on him. Zizek crying fascist, like Marcello in The Conformist a bit.Qlipothhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17343878659776948134noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18174466.post-81071439785463231742010-03-01T17:06:31.052-08:002010-03-01T17:06:31.052-08:00Okay, let me know, we'll get together, I like ...Okay, let me know, we'll get together, I like to meet new goodlookers. Traxus has all my details, as phone (gawd, I'm not putting another one on the blogs) and knows that I am able to control some of my appurtenances in Pubick Houses... <br /><br />ARPEGE! Where did Owen use 'replete' wrongly?' I gotta take a 15 minute nap.Complaisant Personnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18174466.post-54554053816846587982010-03-01T16:57:35.434-08:002010-03-01T16:57:35.434-08:00I'm not in Manhattan at the moment dear, but ...I'm not in Manhattan at the moment dear, but I will be there now and again. <br /><br />I miss bialys. And everything else.anodynelitehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09196712046993163381noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18174466.post-6903845779082282282010-03-01T16:54:51.616-08:002010-03-01T16:54:51.616-08:00Oh well, I don't know, I really don't appr...Oh well, I don't know, I really don't approve of f-g h-g, I mean, I thought you'd been around the goddam block, honey... I also do not respect internet-speak when I don't know what it is? Hello? IRL? is that like goddam URL' <br /><br />Did YOU eat a Chicken Cacciatore today? Well, I did.Complaisant Personnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18174466.post-5213918377620149672010-03-01T16:49:00.080-08:002010-03-01T16:49:00.080-08:00I didn't know Anne Coulter was even talked abo...I didn't know Anne Coulter was even talked about anymore, the idiot. <br /><br />Oh gawd, on the Upper East Side! <br /><br />There goes the Neighborhood! <br /><br />What will Lee Radziwill think!<br /><br />We ought to have a Kir at the Pierre sometime this spring, Anodyne, if you'd care to play around in a highly stylized public discreet setting. We could smile *public person smiles* while fingering each other's whoreparts...Complaisant Personnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18174466.post-39422784502704558492010-03-01T16:44:03.101-08:002010-03-01T16:44:03.101-08:00I go back and forth in my mind between identifying...I go back and forth in my mind between identifying Zizek with Borat and Anne Coulter. Those are the only two 'characters' I can think of who just barely get away with saying the same sorts of things Zizek says to whip rooms full of privilege into an ecstatic frenzies of self-admiration.<br /><br />IRL, of course, Anne Coulter is a f-g h-g who lives on the Upper East Side. What is Zizek IRL? Basically, the idiot Anne Coulter plays on TV for $$$$.anodynelitehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09196712046993163381noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18174466.post-5320293584812694812010-03-01T16:39:06.808-08:002010-03-01T16:39:06.808-08:00But I've quit the Dejan scene, because I got t...But I've quit the Dejan scene, because I got tired of the personal harassment by Nick, which nearly destroyed me (I'm sure many bloggers were rooting for this to succeed, but I would have had to run out of money, and be even more or a romantic fool than I was, so it didn't work, and I started fucking again.) but, you know, personal courage and honesty are not nearkly so valued as they once were (I don't mean 'white lies', I've been doing them ever since I learned it from Bill Clinton, but the serious core lies, about l'amour, no, I just don't do that: It's the mark of a true coward and vacuum of a person.). <br /><br />Oh lord, Arpege, he barely even mentioned you. Don't flip out about this asshole. He did have me so freaked out at one point that I was afraid he'd done some really serious offline harm, but that didn't happen. So PLEASE, don't get a hangnail attack like Dominic Dworking. I'M the one who's been harassed, not you. It's all over now, though, because I told Dejan I wouldn't write anything over there unless he did 'blog partners' with me and gave me deleition privileges. I didn't expect him to, and he didn't, so I suspect 'Old Nick' was paying him all along for the privilege of trying to 'usurp' my notoriety, since he's used to getting it. Although, it wasn't much to give up, I can tell you that. Anybody that doesn't know what blog sex is has problems. And you'll see that Dejan is constantly talking about bloggers fucking and sucking, this is so silly, sex talk on line is for starting something real, it is not satisfactory online, once a few masturbation sessions are over (we did one during the Oscars, for example, or at least I did; I think he was really just into manipultation ane micromanaging. It took me a long time to understand, because I couldn't understand how anybody got any SEXUAL pleasure from blog manipulation. Well, maybe they do. I don't see how, especially if they're in are 'age group' and he is (47 years old, I think, yhounger than me, older than you.) But he just goes from one political fantasy to another, when Bush/Cheney were there, he supported them hook/line and sinker, and don't think for a minute that your favourite 'Brunette Dumb Blonde' wasn't over there 'sucking' all the time. He claims that, in real life, she couldn't quit cruising his crotch. Well, I'm glad he had good homosexual sex at least once.Complaisant Personnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18174466.post-31942578071993257972010-03-01T16:37:45.777-08:002010-03-01T16:37:45.777-08:00But I've quit the Dejan scene, because I got t...But I've quit the Dejan scene, because I got tired of the personal harassment by Nick, which nearly destroyed me (I'm sure many bloggers were rooting for this to succeed, but I would have had to run out of money, and be even more or a romantic fool than I was, so it didn't work, and I started fucking again.) but, you know, personal courage and honesty are not nearkly so valued as they once were (I don't mean 'white lies', I've been doing them ever since I learned it from Bill Clinton, but the serious core lies, about l'amour, no, I just don't do that: It's the mark of a true coward and vacuum of a person.). <br /><br />Oh lord, Arpege, he barely even mentioned you. Don't flip out about this asshole. He did have me so freaked out at one point that I was afraid he'd done some really serious offline harm, but that didn't happen. So PLEASE, don't get a hangnail attack like Dominic Dworking. I'M the one who's been harassed, not you. It's all over now, though, because I told Dejan I wouldn't write anything over there unless he did 'blog partners' with me and gave me deleition privileges. I didn't expect him to, and he didn't, so I suspect 'Old Nick' was paying him all along for the privilege of trying to 'usurp' my notoriety, since he's used to getting it. Although, it wasn't much to give up, I can tell you that. Anybody that doesn't know what blog sex is has problems. And you'll see that Dejan is constantly talking about bloggers fucking and sucking, this is so silly, sex talk on line is for starting something real, it is not satisfactory online, once a few masturbation sessions are over (we did one during the Oscars, for example, or at least I did; I think he was really just into manipultation ane micromanaging. It took me a long time to understand, because I couldn't understand how anybody got any SEXUAL pleasure from blog manipulation. Well, maybe they do. I don't see how, especially if they're in are 'age group' and he is (47 years old, I think, yhounger than me, older than you.) But he just goes from one political fantasy to another, when Bush/Cheney were there, he supported them hook/line and sinker, and don't think for a minute that your favourite 'Brunette Dumb Blonde' wasn't over there 'sucking' all the time. He claims that, in real life, she couldn't quit cruising his crotch. Well, I'm glad he had good homosexual sex at least once.Complaisant Personnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18174466.post-41942401952797851502010-03-01T16:37:20.521-08:002010-03-01T16:37:20.521-08:00but really did someone tell you he sent me a text?...but really did someone tell you he sent me a text? did he mention any other acts of harrassment?<br /><br />Oh no, dear, that was just to tell me that, as he said, EVERYBODY IN THE UNIVERSE LOATHES YOUR GUTS NOW AND ETERNALLY. He harassed ME, dear, not you. He actually hacked emails and such stuff, and is currently writing at Dejan (all the non-Dejan people are 'old nick', he's a malicious troll.)<br /><br />No, sorry, martin and ajb ARE the same, but let's not belabour that. The only way you could prove they weren't is to say that one of them was YOU. That's YOUR fault for not following the 'eros affair'. That was ME and Nick Land, one of the founders (along wi8th Sadie Plant) of CCRU (CyberCultureResearchUnit), out of which Nick/Robin/Reza half-occult, half-philosophy blog Hyperstition. <br /><br />While he was trolling with me somehow 'in thrall', he came on as 'hyacinth', an extreme capitalist stockbroker; lafayette (who remains) as a 'working class hero', and any other thing he could come up with. It's all games to him. He was well-known at Hyperstition for being an extrreme neoconservative and supporting Bush and Cheney till Obama won the race. After that, he immediately started getting all sexy with me at Dejan, and I, in my stupid profligacy, went along with it for a ridiculous amount of time. I thought it was Robin for awhile, even Dominic at one oint, then I realized it was Nick, and it still carried on. You see, I didn't know he just hated my guts, but a couple of sly bloggers helped me figure out (nobody else cared, since I'm considered such a pariah) and one had the guts, despite all my bad speech at the time, to confront him on the blog, who had been an old follower, and that was the end.<br /><br />Dejan now idiotically concentrating on how I asked you about the Townhouse, as if for 'cruising adviece'. Actually, I don't even know if they serve food. I never go to any clubs unless they do, or never just for drinks, which bores me. I do remember that in Paris there were VERY fine gay restaurant pick-up places, with delicious food, like La Mendigotte near rue de Rivoli, and also le St-Hilaire, but I imagine those are long-gone. This kind of elegant gay restaurant sex-bar is unknown in New York, unless the Townhouse is like that it doesn't sound so, although it sounds nice if you want to spend money just for drinks. I don't.)Complaisant Personnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18174466.post-56680493367259988132010-03-01T16:11:59.830-08:002010-03-01T16:11:59.830-08:00"the 'ajb' you"
that's con..."the 'ajb' you" <br /><br />that's confused - ajb is someone else, I know who that is. Martin had a different name there at Lenin's, something like "Steve Hall".<br /><br />but really did someone tell you he sent me a text? did he mention any other acts of harrassment?Qlipothhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17343878659776948134noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18174466.post-58841795689587273722010-03-01T10:13:48.251-08:002010-03-01T10:13:48.251-08:0022 feb--believe me, dear, I wouldn't know. Th...22 feb--believe me, dear, I wouldn't know. The whole point was to interest me endlessly by being cryptic, but I lost interest a couple of weeks ago, it's too silly to play blog-identity games after awhile you just have to go on and be who you are, no matter how ghoulish. He always wrote me in real emails and on the blog differently, and would never allow both to be known as the same, but always left obvious clues. It's a stupid nerd sickness of no interest to me. I had mistakenly thought he was also a physically sexy and attractive man. That's still possible that he once was, but when you just want to 'talk sex', I dont' care about it if I know it's never going to happen. He's married with kids, some of these closet cases really are something.<br /><br />But yes, he's the same as 'martin', and the 'ajb' you had some good slugging with at lenin. lenin though it was me, I thought that hilarious, but I had written nothing there on that thread. 'ajb' = Martin. He's now permanently at Dejan, and actually has been for probably 2 years, but I didn't notice till late Decemeber 2008.Complaisant Personnoreply@blogger.com